[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833481#action_12833481
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2262:
--------------------------------------

It doesn't seem like this type of bug is not one that people would rely on 
(throwing an exception for ? but not for *), hence we should just fix and not 
make it conditional on matchVersion?

> QueryParser should now allow leading '?' wildcards
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2262
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: Flex Branch
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Flex Branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2262.patch, LUCENE-2262_backwards.patch
>
>
> QueryParser currently throws an exception if a wildcard term begins with the 
> ? operator.
> The docs say this:
> {noformat}
> When set, * or ? are allowed as the first character of a PrefixQuery and 
> WildcardQuery.
> Note that this can produce very slow queries on big indexes. 
> {noformat}
> In the flex branch, this is no longer true. foo?, ?foo, f?oo, these are all 
> the same from a performance perspective.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to