Hi Uwe: Many thanks for the explanation. Best regards, Marcelo. On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Uwe Schindler <uschind...@pangaea.de> wrote: > I forget this is so since 2.9.1 and 3.0.0, see the java-dev mailing list. > > ----- > UWE SCHINDLER > Webserver/Middleware Development > PANGAEA - Publishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data > MARUM - University of Bremen > Room 2500, Leobener Str., D-28359 Bremen > Tel.: +49 421 218 65595 > Fax: +49 421 218 65505 > http://www.pangaea.de/ > E-mail: uschind...@pangaea.de > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:55 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: Release of Lucene Java 3.0.1 and 2.9.2 >> >> This correct. If you compile your own version it is not generating the >> same artifact as released. Therefore it has -dev in the name. >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Marcelo Ochoa [mailto:marcelo.oc...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:30 PM >> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Release of Lucene Java 3.0.1 and 2.9.2 >> > >> > Hi Uwe: >> > I just download latest 2.9.2 from an Apache mirror (src.zip >> version) >> > and I found that at common-build.xml file version string is defined >> > as: >> > >> > <property name="dev.version" value="2.9.2-dev"/> >> > <property name="spec.version" value="${version}"/> >> > >> > Is this right or should be 2.9.2? >> > I am using this string when build a new Lucene Domain Index >> > distribution file. >> > Best regards, Marcelo. >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> >> wrote: >> > > Hello Lucene users, >> > > >> > > On behalf of the Lucene development community I would like to >> > announce the release of Lucene Java versions 3.0.1 and 2.9.2: >> > > >> > > Both releases fix bugs in the previous versions: >> > > >> > > - 2.9.2 is a bugfix release for the Lucene Java 2.x series, based >> on >> > Java 1.4 >> > > - 3.0.1 has the same bug fix level but is for the Lucene Java 3.x >> > series, based on Java 5. >> > > >> > > New users of Lucene are advised to use version 3.0.1 for new >> > developments, because it has a clean, type-safe API. >> > > >> > > Important improvements in these releases include: >> > > >> > > - An increased maximum number of unique terms in each index >> segment. >> > > - Fixed experimental CustomScoreQuery to respect per-segment >> search. >> > This introduced an API change! >> > > - Important fixes to IndexWriter: a commit() thread-safety issue, >> > lost document deletes in near real-time indexing. >> > > - Bugfixes for Contrib's Analyzers package. >> > > - Restoration of some public methods that were lost during >> > deprecation removal. >> > > - The new Attribute-based TokenStream API now works correctly with >> > different class loaders. >> > > >> > > Both releases are fully compatible with the corresponding previous >> > versions. We strongly recommend upgrading to 2.9.2 if you are using >> > 2.9.1 or 2.9.0; and to 3.0.1 if you are using 3.0.0. >> > > >> > > See core changes at >> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_1/changes/Changes.html >> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_2/changes/Changes.html >> > > >> > > and contrib changes at >> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_1/changes/Contrib-Changes.html >> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_2/changes/Contrib-Changes.html >> > > >> > > Binary and source distributions are available at >> > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/java/ >> > > >> > > Lucene artifacts are also available in the Maven2 repository at >> > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/ >> > > >> > > ----- >> > > Uwe Schindler >> > > uschind...@apache.org >> > > Apache Lucene Java Committer >> > > Bremen, Germany >> > > http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Marcelo F. Ochoa >> > http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/ >> > http://mochoa.sites.exa.unicen.edu.ar/ >> > ______________ >> > Want to integrate Lucene and Oracle? >> > http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2007/09/running-lucene-inside-your- >> > oracle-jvm.html >> > Is Oracle 11g REST ready? >> > http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-oracle-11g-rest- >> ready.html >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
-- Marcelo F. Ochoa http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/ http://mochoa.sites.exa.unicen.edu.ar/ ______________ Want to integrate Lucene and Oracle? http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2007/09/running-lucene-inside-your-oracle-jvm.html Is Oracle 11g REST ready? http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-oracle-11g-rest-ready.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
