I think that would be ideal because right now it is somewhat confusing
on where to pull your latest-and-greatest from and what should you
base your patches on.

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 14:21, Chris Male <gento...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that would be ideal because we can then start getting some nightly
> builds using (new)trunk as well.
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Michael McCandless
> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>> Right, I think it's ready to be 'the trunk'... I'm now doing all my
>> work on it.  When a take an issue, I apply the patch there, and run
>> all tests there, etc.  I don't use "old trunk" alone anymore.
>>
>> I agree, at some point soon we should rename it in svn so things are
>> less confusing :)  Ie, trunk -> oldtrunk, newtrunk -> trunk.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Chris Male <gento...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > If we are developing on newtrunk and merging to the old trunk, what
>> > issues
>> > are preventing it from becoming 'the trunk'? or was that what you were
>> > suggesting?
>> > Cheers
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Michael McCandless
>> > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think we should.
>> >>
>> >> It (newtrunk) was created to test Hoss's side-by-sdie proposal, and
>> >> that approach looks to be working very well.
>> >>
>> >> Up until now we've been committing to the old trunk and then
>> >> systematically merging over to newtrunk.  I think we should now flip
>> >> that, ie, commit to newtrunk and only merge back to the old trunk if
>> >> for some strange reason it's needed.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> >> > Are we now only working on newtrunk?
>> >> >
>> >> > -----
>> >> > Uwe Schindler
>> >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> >> > http://www.thetaphi.de
>> >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Michael McCandless (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
>> >> >> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 11:22 AM
>> >> >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you
>> >> >> optionally enable reader pooling
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>      [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>> >> >> ]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2297.
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>     Resolution: Fixed
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Fixed on newtrunk.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling
>> >> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >                 Key: LUCENE-2297
>> >> >> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
>> >> >> 2297
>> >> >> >             Project: Lucene - Java
>> >> >> >          Issue Type: Improvement
>> >> >> >            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>> >> >> >            Priority: Minor
>> >> >> >             Fix For: 3.1
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >         Attachments: LUCENE-2297.patch
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > For apps using a large index and frequently need to commit and
>> >> >> resolve deletes, the cost of opening the SegmentReaders on demand
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> every commit can be prohibitive.
>> >> >> > We an already pool readers (NRT does so), but, we only turn it on
>> >> >> > if
>> >> >> NRT readers are in use.
>> >> >> > We should allow separate control.
>> >> >> > We should do this after LUCENE-2294.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
>



-- 
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to