[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849863#action_12849863
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2215:
--------------------------------------------
bq. ...through a fairly simple update of some of the clauses to appropriate
short circuit things that we can just hook this into the existing collectors
w/o no need for any delegation or changes? Let me try a patch. Now that the
benchmark stuff is in, we should be able to test.
This'd make me nervous...
Ie I don't think we should insert bytecodes for the 99.9% of searches that
wouldn't make use of this, even if we can't uncover a slowdown with
benchmarking.
We should still benchmark it though (I'm curious)... we should also benchmark
the delegate solution.
> paging collector
> ----------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2215
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.4, 3.0
> Reporter: Adam Heinz
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: IterablePaging.java, LUCENE-2215.patch,
> PagingCollector.java, TestingPagingCollector.java
>
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?focusedCommentId=12796898&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12796898
> Somebody assign this to Aaron McCurry and we'll see if we can get enough
> votes on this issue to convince him to upload his patch. :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
