On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:24:34AM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote: > > Maybe aggressive automatic data-reduction makes more sense in the context of > > "flexible matching", which is more expansive than "flexible scoring"? > > I think so. Maybe it shouldn't be called a Similarity (which to me > (though, carrying a heavy curse of knowledge burden...) means > "scoring")? Matcher?
I think we can express the difference between your proposed approach for Lucene Similarity (no effect on index) and my proposed approach for Lucy Similarity (aggressive index-time data reduction) by putting Lucy's Similarity under Lucy::Index instead of Lucy::Search. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
