David, I totally agree with this idea. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:58 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote: > > I observed this problem when I started using Lucene (ages ago) and it's a > shame this situation persists. In summary, it would be tremendously useful > if Query objects were fully mutable and offered a visitor pattern to allow > walking the query tree to facilitate rewriting. It would also be nice if > Query.java had a getFieldName() for those subclasses which search against a > particular field. I could open a JIRA issue... > > ~ David Smiley > Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book > > ----- > Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book > -- > View this message in context: > http://n3.nabble.com/Query-modifier-tp567265p686285.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
