>>>>> "MD" == Moses DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MD> I agree. It is ugly. I would not want to use it myself. Still,
MD> you should have the right to use it if you want to. Microsoft
MD> should not be able to tell you how to run your software.
Yes, it should not but their goal is exactly to have *total* control
on the SW industry. When we try to promote Linux we should use this
angle more than the technical merit of the OS. MS took away, well it
tried to take away, our freedom of choice. Avoiding MS software it's
about restoring one of our basic civil rights. A society, any form of
society, without freedom of choice is in fact a dictatorship.
--
Paolo
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Michael Schubart
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Carl Hewitt
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Christopher Hinds
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Jaco Greeff
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Lothar Klaffenb�ck
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Kontorotsui
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Martin Little
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- (offtopic) Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&am... Paolo Ciccone
- (offtopic) Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&am... Richard Jones
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? dion
