David Craig wrote:
> shuJIT doesn't appear to be mentioned very often in performance
> comparisons in this list. Its website boasts performance results that are
> usually better than TYA 1.2v3,
Benchmark tests on the page, Linpack benchmark,
Eratosthenes sieve and CaffeineMark isn't usual
applications.
I, an author of shuJIT, don't think that shuJIT is
usually faster than TYA. Which of the two JITs is faster
depends on kind of applications.
I'm evaluating Java implementations of candidates for
AES. An algorithm is boosted more by TYA, but another
one is adapted to shuJIT better.
> and I'd be curious to hear about it's ease of use.
> (http://www.shudo.net/jit/)
Its usage is the same as other JITs.
You can use it by the JVM option `-Djava.compiler=shujit'
or setting an environmental variable `JAVA_COMPILER=shujit'.
Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking!
Muraoka Lab., Grad. School of Sci. & Eng., Waseda Univ.
