Peter Keegan wrote:
I did some additional testing with Chris's patch and mine (based on Doug's note) vs. no patch and found that all 3 produced the same throughput - about 330 qps - over a longer period.
Was CPU utilizaton 100%? If not, where do you think the bottleneck now is? Network? Or some other Java monitor contention?
Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
