I read somewhere recently (maybe even on this list) a
recommendation to requery each time for successive
pages as this avoids some of the complexity involved
in session management. Whats peoples view of this?
Marc
--- karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 27 apr 2006 kl. 20.44 skrev Jean Sini:
> > Our application presents search results in a
> paginated form.
> >
> > We were unable to find Searcher methods that would
> return, say, 'n'
> > (typically, 10) hits after a start offset 'k'.
> >
> > So we're currently using the Hits collection
> returned by
> > Searcher.search,
> > and using its Hits.doc(i) method to get the ith
> hit, with i between
> > k and
> > k+n. Is that the most efficient way to do that? Is
> there a better
> > way (e.g.
> > some form of Filter on the query itself)?
>
> You probably want to do it just the way you do.
>
> But cache the Hits somehow. Perhaps in a session,
> perhaps globally
> in /your/ searcher. Perhaps the session points at
> the global cache
> so it doesn't change within a session when you flush
> the cache on
> index update.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo
http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
