Hi Yonik,
>> I can't figure out what the parameters does. ;)
>
> Yes, it will fail without slop... I don't think there is a practical
> way around that.
I am trying to analyze your WordDelimiterFilter.
If I have x-men, after analyzing (with catenateAll) I get this:
Analzying "The x-men story"
de.unihd.ub.ftsearch.WordIndexAnalyzer:
[the] [x] [men] [xmen] [story]
1: [the:0->3:word]
2: [x:4->5:word]
3: [men:6->9:word] [xmen:4->9:word]
4: [story:10->15:word]
1: [the]
2: [x]
3: [men] [xmen]
4: [story]
So a Phrase search to "The xmen story" will fail. With a slop of 1 the
doc will be found.
But when generating the query I won't know when to use a slop. So adding
slops isn't a nice solution.
Would it be a solution, to take the concatenated synonyms to both
Positions? Or are there any drawbacks with this?
1: [the]
2: [x] [xmen]
3: [men] [xmen]
4: [story]
thanks,
martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
