I feel implementing the Lucene inside the RDBMS is nothing but implementation of following interfaces :
TermDocs TermVector TermPositions -----Original Message----- From: Karel Tejnora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:11 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Advantage of putting lucene index in RDBMS One think, generally use RDBM for the STORED fields is good idea because every segment merging / optimize copies those data once or twice (cfs). I'm thinking about to put STORED fields in extra file and put pointers in cfs. Delete will just mark document as delete. And new operation omptimize_full deletes and corrects pointers. Karel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
