Thanks for your help guy. I'll test that query parser.
Marcelo
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:37 PM, Renaud Waldura wrote:
Read my own complaints about QueryParser here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lucene-user&m=116069469827270&w=2
You're in for a surprise. As alluded by Erick, the stock QP doesn't
quite do
what one (legitimately IMO) expects.
--Renaud
-----Original Message-----
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 11:56 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery
These are not boolean operators, which is often confusing. See the
thread
"*Another problem with the QueryParser*"
for an exposition by Chris about how these operate. This may change
what you
expect to come back from the parser... If it doesn't, then maybe
someone
else can chime in <G>...
Erick
On 12/6/06, Marcelo Ohashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if lucene can handle complex boolean queries
like the following ones?
1. T: (A OR NOT B)
2. (T:A AND NOT T:B) OR NOT T:C
Cause I figured out in some tests that the results were not
really what I expected.
Thanks in advance,
_____________
Marcelo Ohashi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
