Hi Chris:
<snip>

> (1) Each field is searchable and indexable.

...and I assumed hte real problem is being ableto address use cases like
"find all documents where the DRECONTENT contains the words "Action" and
the words "News" near eachother -- using stemming and other Text Analysys
tricks i may wnat to customize on a per field basis) which make me think
Lucene is a better choice then a straight relational database.
 Yep, may be Mark can clarify the expected use cases for searching.
 But, the mixed mode can coexists.
 I am working on the Oracle/Lucene integration, so you can perfectly
store the content of the XML document in a relational table leaving
the DRECONTENT in a CLOB column and this column indexed with Lucene.
 Querying for /DOCUMENT/[DREREFERENCE=61926433] can be transformed by
the optimizer into a "select ... for ... where DREREFERENCE=61926433"
(using a btree implementation)
 and "find all documents where the DRECONTENT contains the words
"Action" " into
 select ... for where lcontains(DRECONTENT,'Action')>0
 The two world can coexists very well :)

:   Yes, you can build an inverted index for 10 million documents
: perfectly, but the XML documents showed look like a simple relational
: data.

again, perception ... nothing in the question asked about doing relational
queries, so i don't think it's wise to immediately suggest a relational
database as the "recommended" solution.
 Best regards, Marcelo.
--
Marcelo F. Ochoa
http://marcelo.ochoa.googlepages.com/home
______________
Do you Know DBPrism? Look @ DB Prism's Web Site
http://www.dbprism.com.ar/index.html
More info?
Chapter 17 of the book "Programming the Oracle Database using Java &
Web Services"
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1555583296/
Chapter 21 of the book "Professional XML Databases" - Wrox Press
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1861003587/
Chapter 8 of the book "Oracle & Open Source" - O'Reilly
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/oracleopen/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to