*SpanNearQuery<file:///C:/lucene-2.1.0/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/SpanNearQuery.html#SpanNearQuery%28org.apache.lucene.search.spans.SpanQuery%5B%5D,%20int,%20boolean%29> *(SpanQuery<file:///C:/lucene-2.1.0/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/SpanQuery.html>[] clauses, int slop, boolean inOrder)
Erick On 7/30/07, Joe Attardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about the case where I want to search a MAC address? For example, > 00:14:da:81:21:4f will be split by the StandardTokenizer as the tokens > "00", "14", "da", "81", "21", and "4f". > > Suppose I want to search for 00:14:da:81:21:4f. In the search box, I type > 00:14:da:81:21:4f. But because these are all separate tokens, it would > still > find a match if it had all the tokens but in a different order - for > example, that query would also find a MAC of da:14:4f:21:00:81. Is there > some way to enforce the order in which terms appear, or should I just > index > a MAC address as UN_TOKENIZED ? > > Thanks > > -- > Joe Attardi > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://thinksincode.blogspot.com/ > > On 7/30/07, Ard Schrijvers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So then would I just concatenate the tokens together to form > > > the query text? > > > > You might better create a TermQuery for each token instead of > > concatenating, and combine them in a BooleanQuery and say wether all > terms > > must or should occur. Very simple, see [1] > > > > Regards Ard > > > > [1] > > > http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.html > > > > > > > > -- > > > Joe Attardi > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://thinksincode.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > On 7/30/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Would this work? > > > > > > > > TokenStream ts = StandardAnalyzer.tokenStream(); > > > > while ((Token tok = ts.next()) != null) { > > > > do whatever > > > > } > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Erick > > > > > > > > On 7/30/07, Joe Attardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Following up on my recent question. It has been suggested > > > to me that I > > > > can > > > > > run the query text through an Analyzer without using the > > > QueryParser. > > > > For > > > > > example, if I know what field to be searched I can create > > > a PrefixQuery > > > > or > > > > > WildcardQuery, but still want to process the search text > > > with the same > > > > > Analyzer that did the indexing. How do I run a query > > > through an Analyzer > > > > > without using the QueryParser... is this possible? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
