Glad it worked out for you.... Did you ever have any insight into what was magical about 87,300? Although now that I re-read your mail, that was the number of characters, so I can imagine that your corpus averaged 8.73 characters/word <G>....
Best Erick On 8/1/07, Eduardo Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Erick!! > > You're right, I just use setMaxFieldLength() and all work fine. > > You save my life, thanks! (y) > > On 7/30/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > See IndexWriter.setMaxFieldLength(). 87,300 is odd, since the default > > max field length, last I knew, was 10,000. But this sounds like > > it might relate to your issue. > > > > Best > > Erick > > > > On 7/27/07, Eduardo Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I would like to know if exist some limit of size for the fields of a > > > document. > > > > > > I'm with the following problem: > > > When a term is after a certain amount of characters (approximately > > 87300) > > > in > > > a field, the search does not find de occurrency. > > > If I divide my field in pages, the terms are found normally. > > > This problem occours when I make an exact query (query between quotes) > > > > > > What can be happening? > > > > > > I'm using BrazilianAnalyzer and StandardAnalyzer(for tests only) for > > both, > > > search and indexation. > > > > > > thanks... > > > > > > Sorry for my poor english... > > > > > >
