Mike, as a committer, what do you think? Thanks!
Peter Keegan wrote: > > I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress > testing with no problems. > I'd give it a thumbs up. > > Peter > > On 7/30/07, testn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth >> to >> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people >> can >> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking >> changes >> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644 >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
