What is advantage to use term
frequency vector?
thanks,
DT
www.ejinz.com Search News
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kai Hu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 8:40 PM
Subject: 答复: Get the terms and frequency vector of an indexed but unstored
field
you use the flag to state the should store term? does it mean that you use
the Field.Store.YES to store the large data? Can it reduce the data's
size?
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: tierecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2007年8月3日 星期五 21:35
收件人: java-user@lucene.apache.org
主题: Re: Get the terms and frequency vector of an indexed but unstored
field
Thanks a lot, that works 100%!...
Fortunately, I did use the flag to state that Lucene should store the term
frequency vector. Otherwise, I'd have to index 77GB right now... :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Get-the-terms-and-frequency-vector-of-an-indexed-but-unstored-field-tf4211430.html#a11983495
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
