Thanks a lot for the response!
Is there some special config that needs to be done to share the locks
or just point both servers to the same location ?
Pointers to docs would help a great deal too...
Thanks again!
On Oct 17, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Chris Lu wrote:
To my experience from a project, using software DBSight, Lucene
runs well on
a SAN environment.
No experience of a NFS, but I know many indexing errors caused by
NFS. Maybe
the new index delete policy helps in latest version of Lucene.
--
Chris Lu
-------------------------
Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application
site: http://www.dbsight.net
demo: http://search.dbsight.com
Lucene Database Search in 3 minutes:
http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.php?
title=Create_Lucene_Database_Search_in_3_minutes
On 10/17/07, Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All!
We use lucene 2.0.0 as the search index of our portal (liferay based)
and are trying to use it correctly in a cluster...
I'm very foggy on wether i should share the index file using NFS (the
servers run linux) or wether we should try the jdbc store...
We currently have the index in an NFS mounted volume, however i'm
pretty sure that the servers are not sharing locks, and don't know
that the other node exists... Both servers read and write to the
index freely currently.
Can you give me advise as to what's best in this setup (share nfs vs
jdbc) and how to make the nodes in the cluster know about each other
so that they don't step on each others feet?
Pointers to documentation are very welcome too!
Thanks a lot in advance for your response!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
