On Friday 30 November 2007 12:59:13 Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hmmm, I think you should be able to rely on the fact that Fields are > stored in order of indexing and then read back in that same order.
Yeah, tought about that for a moment but this is just way to fragile. > Otherwise, the reading twice approach makes sense. Yes, it makes sense the question is whether it performs. The sense of a FieldSelector as I understand it is to save disk IO (ans maybe also save a couple of bytes RAM...). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
