I am very interested indeed, do I understand correctly that the tweak you made reduces the memory when searching if you have many docs in the index?? I am omitting norms too.
If that is the case, can someone point me to what is hte required change that should be done? I understand from Yoniks comment that this could not make it to the core no? thanks javier On Jan 8, 2008 10:56 AM, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:20 -0800, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Please post your results, Lars! > > Tried the patch, and it failed to compile (plain Lucene compiled fine). > In the process, I looked at TermQuery and found that it'd be easier to > copy that code and just hardcode 1.0f for all norms. Did that and ran > our test index of 50 million entries. Instead of the 50-60MB it used > before, it is now down to 8-9MB. For Yonik: This is measured using > jconsole. Do you have a better tool? > > I'll do a few more tests to see how it scales, but this is definitely > the way out for us. Thanks for the cluons! > > > -Lars > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
