Yes, it is optimized already. But today, when I got to test again, its looks like quick. :S I can't understand why.
Michael Stoppelman wrote: > > Did your index size increase drastically? > > As a first step I would recommend optimizing your index if you haven't > already. > > -M > > On Feb 12, 2008 7:42 PM, Cesar Ronchese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I was doing normal queries happily, seeing the results statistics come in >> about 0.02 seconds. >> >> But then, I added a extra field to seach togheter with the normal query, >> then the statistic pulled up to 0.35 seconds. That was a lot. >> >> example: >> normal query: some test (it returns quick) >> extra field query: +bookDate:"2007/02/12" some test (it returns slow. I >> also >> tried without +) >> >> Is the reduced performance normal for this case? >> >> >> Another doubt, I thought forcing bookDate in the Search Text it would >> reduce >> the universe of search, then leading to quicker responses. But it didn't. >> Is >> there a trick to improve the speed? >> >> Cesar >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-multiple-field-search-performance-tp15448754p15448754.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-multiple-field-search-performance-tp15448754p15456841.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
