Yes, I found it is because the index-files are bad, it is not because of the time-resolution( my resolution is yyyy-MM-ddHH:mm:ss, as I work for a newspaper group-company, so the time of news pulishing must be more accurate than normal use!) But now the time sorting is alright! I can sorting the 110000 results by time in 0.02 secends! Thank you for your response!
Erick Erickson wrote: > > This has been discussed many times on the list, you'd find a wealth > of information if you searched the mail archive. > > The problem usually is that you've stored your dates with fine > resolution. Sorting is dependent on the number of terms, and > if you store millisecond resolution you'll obviously have waaaaaay > more terms than if you store second resolution. Day resolution is > even better. > > Also your first sort takes much longer than subsequent sorts since > various caches aren't filled until needed. So be sure you're measuring > response times after a few sorted queries have happened. > > Best > Erick > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:27 AM, savageboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hello everyone, >> I have made a search project by use of Lucene2.0 >> But when I use date sorting, the server is running very slow for the >> result >> getting(about 3 sec but I dont sort the results the time of it is about >> 0.019 sec, there are 110000 results to be hit). >> >> document.add(new Field(docFieldName, >> StringUtils.defaultIfEmpty(contentStr, >> ""), storeFlag , tokenizeFlag)); >> >> storeFlag is true >> tokenizeFlag is false >> >> so it means the Field dateTime should be stored and be not tokenized! >> >> If you have some idea about this issue I met, plz let me know! >> Thanks a lot and best Regards! >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Fetches-the-hits-very-slow-%28when-the-date-sorting%29-%21-tp16580375p16580375.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fetches-the-hits-very-slow-%28when-the-date-sorting%29-%21-tp16580375p16599703.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
