I guess I meant searching the index, size of index etc.
So they would search essentially the same?
Sorry that wasn't clear from my original email.
Darren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Which will be faster?
I wouldn't worry about it too much, since there'll be overhead for you
building up the string in the first place as well. I suspect that the
time difference will be dwarfed by the indexing process. So I'd do what's
easiest first.......
Erick
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:51 AM, darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Pardon the noob question. But which approach is going to be faster
over extremely large document sets. A or B?
A) Multiple field values, Stored.NO,TOKENIZED.
word: one
word: two
word: three
B) Single field value, Stored.NO,TOKENIZED
word: one two three
Thanks for the tip.
Darren
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
