Hi, I am creating a new indexWriter to optimize the directory.
I will try using FSDirectory later. Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Hi, > > No need to close parse and it is good to use the same searcher. > I don't understand why you have that IndexWriter there if you are > searching... > > Also, you may not benefit from explicit loading of the index into RAM. > Try without it first. > > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: wolvernie88 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 11:38:43 AM >> Subject: Is this the right way to use Lucene in multithread env? >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Here is what I am using Lucene. >> >> I build the index (from different data source) during midnight. I build a >> FSDirectory. Then I load it into RAMDirectory for the best performance. >> When >> I built it, I called IndexWriter.optimize() once. >> >> Once the index is built, I will never update it. >> >> I have static variable defined as IndexSearcher. Once I load >> RAMDirectory, I >> do >> >> newIndexDirectory = new RAMDirectory(fsDirectory); >> IndexWriter newWriter = new IndexWriter(newIndexDirectory, >> new >> StandardAnalyzer(), true); >> newWriter.optimize(); >> newWriter.close(); >> searcher = new IndexSearcher(newIndexDirectory ); >> >> For every new search, I do >> >> QueryParser parser = new QueryParser("field1", new >> StandardAnalyzer()); >> Query query = parser.parse(queryString); >> Hits hits = searcher.search(query); >> >> Is this the right way? Do I need to close parse, query or hits? >> >> As I have only one IndexSearcher, will it cause any problem? >> >> I found using the same query does not always give me the same response >> time. >> >> Thanks much. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-the-right-way-to-use-Lucene-in-multithread-env--tp17150728p17150728.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-the-right-way-to-use-Lucene-in-multithread-env--tp17150728p17152621.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
