Currently, searching on our index consumes around 2.5GB of ram. This is just a single term query, nothing that requires the in memory cache like in the FieldScoreQuery.
Alex ---------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:25:43 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: lucene memory consumption > > Not that I can think about. But, if you have any cached field data, > norms array, that could be huge. > > Would be interested in knowing from others regarding this topic as well. > > Jian > > On 5/29/08, Alex wrote: >> >> Hi, >> other than the in memory terms (.tii), and the few kilobytes of opened file >> buffer, where are some other sources of significant memory consumption >> when searching on a large index ? (> 100GB). The queries are just normal >> term queries. >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> 隨身的 Windows Live Messenger 和 Hotmail，不限時地掌握資訊盡在指間 — Windows Live for Mobile >> http://www.msn.com.tw/msnmobile/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _________________________________________________________________ 隨身的 Windows Live Messenger 和 Hotmail，不限時地掌握資訊盡在指間 — Windows Live for Mobile http://www.msn.com.tw/msnmobile/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
