Thanks Mike.
Michael McCandless-2 wrote: > > > Yes, downgrading is really the only option now, unfortunately. > > That, and voting for this bug at Sun (note you can vote for the same > bug 3 times), which seems to be the root cause of the corruption: > > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6707044 > > It's been open for 6 weeks now and besides being accepted by Sun > there's been no other response. It's marked (surprisingly) as low > priority. > > While we've worked around it in Lucene, as best I can tell, you really > can't be sure so downgrading is the safest course of action. > > Mike > > dan at gmail wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> I don't have a good understanding of what options for avoid this >> corrupted >> index problem described in LUCENE-1282. It seems to me that I either >> downgrade JRE from 1.6.0_06 to 1.6.0_03, or wait for an official >> release of >> Lucene 2.4.0 which includes a workaround for this JRE bug. >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1282 >> >> Do I have any other options? >> >> Thanks, >> Dan >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-1282-tp18224180p18224180.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-1282-tp18224180p18225153.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
