Thanks for correcting me on this, I had no idea...... Just goes to show
what happens when an amateur gets in the mix <G>.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Сергій Карпенко wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are correct - NO_NORMS has nothing to do with tokenization,
>> thats mean no analyzers used.
>>
>
> Just to avoid this ambiguous, semi-contradicting wording confusing the hell
> out of anyone...
>
> NO_NORMS *does* have something to do with tokenisation -- it implies
> UN_TOKENIZED.
>
> Source code QFT:
>
> } else if (index == Index.NO_NORMS) {
> this.isIndexed = true;
> this.isTokenized = false;
> this.omitNorms = true;
> } ...
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Noll
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
