Exactly as Otis sais, you should use MatchAllDocs as query, but it has a
drawback in performance, it checks every single document deletion state,
I've solved the issue by making my own EnhancedMatchAllDocs query that is
optimized to do not check this document state.
Perhaps the SegmentReader should be refactorized in some other way and not
be synchronized:
public synchronized boolean isDeleted(int n) {
return (deletedDocs != null && deletedDocs.get(n));
}
With high level of concurrency this is an issue, there is a lot of
context-switching because of this line of code...
I didn't try an optimal solution, so I created my own EnhancedMatchAllDocs.
Just copied the original class and replaced this call:
public boolean next() {
while (id < maxId) {
id++;
if (!reader.isDeleted(id)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
For this simplified call:
public boolean next() {
return (id++ < maxId);
}
This change doesn't validate deleted documents, in my implementation it was
not a problem, so, it's possible that this solution doesn't work with any
other implementation.
Maybe it wouldn't be a problem if you flush your index often...
GeR
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heiko,
> It's most likely because that B case has a purely negative query. Perhaps
> you can combine it with MatchAllDocs query?
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:29:22 AM
> > Subject: FilteredQuery
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > i would like to use the FilteredQuery to filter my search results with
> > the occurrence or absence of certain ids.
> >
> > Example A:
> > query -> text:"albert einstein"
> > filterQuery -> doctype:letter
> >
> > That's ok. I am getting the expected results. But i got no results, if
> > i filter with the absence of an id.
> >
> > Example B:
> > query -> text:"albert einstein"
> > filterQuery -> NOT doctype:article
> >
> > However following concatenation of filterQuery and query leads to the
> > expected result.
> >
> > Example C:
> > query -> text:"albert einstein"
> > filterQuery -> text:"albert einstein" NOT doctype:article
> >
> > I am confused that Example B does not worked. It is bug?
> >
> > I am using Lucene 2.3.2 and the following code fragement:
> >
> > Query query;
> > Query filterQuery;
> > ...
> > Filter filter = new CachingWrapperFilter(new
> > QueryWrapperFilter(filterQuery));
> > FilteredQuery filteredQuery = new FilteredQuery(query, filter);
> > Hits hits = searcher.search(filteredQuery);
> > ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Heiko Müller
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
