Hi Zender, please take a look to http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-vs.-Database-td19755932.html#a19757274
you shouldn't use a lucene fields to store such huge data. At least not a lucene field in your main search index. You can use lucene as repository, but I would advice you to use a extra index for that. If you want to store arrays you can use store = Store.COMPRESS in constructor public Field(String name, byte[] value, int offset, int length, Store store) with the serialized array as "value". Best regards Karsten Zender00 wrote: > > Hello, > > I have to store 2 arrays (1 int-Array, 1 String-Array (approx. length per > element: 30 chars)) with a count of 100-10.000 elements in a lucene > document. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Save-big-arrays-in-lucene-document-tp20852797p20853980.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
