I think I'm missing something here...
Spell checked in what sense? Sounds to me like you need dictionary
based spell checking during index, not index based spelling during
search, right?
How about hooking up something like the Jazzy spell checker into a
TokenFilter? Then, as the tokens stream by, you lookup the spelling
and then add a 1 byte payload to all words that are misspelled.
As for Highlighter, hmmm... Not sure if there is a way to make a
Fragmenter/Scorer that was payload aware, such that it would only
produce fragments (and scores) for sections of the file that have
these payloads. Definitely pushing my area of expertise, but maybe
one of the Highlighter experts can chime in.
HTH,
Grant
On Dec 11, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Lucene User no 1981 wrote:
Hi,
the problem is as follows: there is a text, ca. 30kb, it has to be
spellchecked automatically, there is no manual intervention, no
suggestions
needed. All I would like to achieve is a simple check if there are any
problems with the spelling or not. It has to be rather fast cause
there are
tons of docs a minute going thru the system. Solutions like
SpellChecker.exists() don't really apply. Additionally, spelling
errors
could be highlighted - haven't really found any reasonable way of
leveraging
Highlighter for that task.
Does anyone have any idea how this problem can be addressed with
Lucene?
Regards,
Mac
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spell-check-of-a-large-text-tp20953625p20953625.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
