Todd Benge wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking into the FieldCache API because of memory problems
we've been seeing in our production environment.
We use various different sorts so over time the cache builds up and
servers stop responding.
I decided to apply the patch for JIRA 831:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831
This patch is likely to change quite a bit soon. A lot of what it was
doing has been taken care of by a separate issue. Whats likely to remain
is just the API change, but even that is likely to change (an iterator
api was discussed). So thats a volatile patch at the moment.
so that I can switch out the caching to an LRU based cache.
One thing I noticed in the code is that there is an array cache built
per IndexReader. I'm wondering what the consequences would be if the
arrays were merged for all IndexReaders. That would result in single
cached array for Strings, Floats, Ints, etc.
The original intent of this patch was almost to do the opposite if I am
understanding you right. In any case, I am not sure why you think this
will help?
It looks like the arrays are used by the various comparators during
the sort but wasn't exactly sure so thought I'd ask what would happen
if I combined the arrays.
I wouldn't combine them. Wouldn't this give less granularity to your LRU
cache anyway? That code is likely to change drastically, and I'm not
sure what advantage you would see. Do you have an index so large that
you can't supply the necessary RAM for the fieldcaches?
How is your custom cache implementation working? Since you are trying to
tweak things, it sounds like you are still having issues? I am not sure
how combining arrays would help you, but I don't understand what you are
trying to solve yet.
- Mark
Thanks,
Todd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]