Hello Uwe,
thank you for clarifying things. I just checked the latest SVN revision
of Lucene and apparently everything still works as it should with my
system. Now I have to check if Trie does the job for me.
I hope that Lucene 3 will include this fancy Trie package.
Best,
Niels
Uwe Schindler schrieb:
Hello Niels,
You cannot use the trie package with current lucene stable. To
compile, you must also apply LUCENE-1478 to the core. Another option
is to checkout trie and remove the SortField and static FieldCache
parsers from TrieUtils. I am the developer of trie and I use it with
trunk lucene on www.pangaea.de.
Uwe
Mit einem Mobiltelefon von Sony Ericsson gesendet
---- Originalnachricht ---- Von: Niels Ott
<n...@sfs.uni-tuebingen.de> Gesendet: An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Speeding up RangeQueries?
Hi Paul,
Paul Elschot schrieb:
Performance normally mostly depends on the number of terms indexed
within the queried range. To limit the number of terms used during
a range search, have a look here for more info on the new
TrieRangeQuery:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/SearchNumericalFields
This looks very promising.
As far as I understand this is only available from the unreleased
development version, right? How safe is this version for use?
Is it possible to use only the org.apache.lucene.search.trie package
from there together with the old and stable Lucene?
Best
Niels
--
Niels Ott
Computational Linguist (B.A.)
http://www.drni.de/niels/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
