On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hmm then I'm a bit baffled again. > > Because, each of your "by month" indexes presumably has a unique > subset of terms for the "date_doc" field? Meaning, a given "by month" > index will have all date_doc corresponding to that month, and a > different "by month" index would presumably have no overlap in the > terms for the date_doc field.
Yes and no :) In this situation: >> 200901-->index1, index2 >> 200902-->index3 >> 200903-->index4,index5,index6 each month does not overlap with each other, but index1 and index2 overlap, and so index4 with 5 and 6. So there's overlapping inside a single month. So I want to trie, next week, this one: >> 200901-->index12 (merge of 1 and 2) >> 200902-->index3 >> 200903-->index456 (merge of 4,5,6) This way we avoid overlapping inside a single month. Maybe this can help: stay tuned :) R. -- Roberto Franchini http://www.celi.it http://www.blogmeter.it http://www.memesphere.it Tel +39-011-6600814 jabber:ro.franch...@gmail.com skype:ro.franchini --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
