walid, can you provide any more information other than "very poor result"?
Others have not measured much difference between morphological analysis and light stemming: http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/pubfiles/ir-249.pdf On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:34 AM, walid<walid.bak...@elementn.com> wrote: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-153 > > based on this, there are two options: > 1- using the aramorph library > 2- moving the code from trunk to the current release and using the > provided arabic analyzer > > 1- the library works very well in indexing, tokenizing, stemming and > everything, but causes memory leaks > 2- the provided library has a very poor result compared to the aramorph > library. > > Is there a plan to have better arabic support with full morphological > analysis support? > > walid > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
