So here's a debug message showing the query:
2009-09-16 18:53:59,642 [DEBUG] [http-8440-2] [] [2144122] []
service.impl.LuceneBaseService: items search('viewable:(FINDALL 0 1 2 )',
BooleanFilter( +CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+issalesallo
wed:true)) +CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(licenseGroupKeys:lablxrox))
+CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+(viewable:1 viewable:2)))
+CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+contentReposit
oryIds:146)) +CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+contentGroupIds:14554))
-CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(digitalReleaseDate:{lablxrox20090916 TO
lablxrox99999999} digitalDeleteDate:[lablxro
x19000101 TO lablxrox20090916]))
-CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+excludedContractIds:all))
-CachingWrapperFilter(QueryWrapperFilter(+excludedContractIds:2144122))),
<custom:"position": null>, 0,
16)
By the way, will it make sense to move this into a jira issue? It'll get quite
tough to find the right information already since this thread is growing quite
fast.
Mark Miller wrote:
> bq. I'll do some profiling now again and let you know the results.
>
> Great - it will be interesting to see the results. My guess, based on
> the 2.9 new api profiling, is that your queries may not be agreeing with
> some of the changes somehow. Along with the profiling, can you fill us
> in on the query types you are using as well? (eg qualities)
>
> And grab invocations if its possible.
>
--
Thomas Becker
Senior JEE Developer
net mobile AG
Zollhof 17
40221 Düsseldorf
GERMANY
Phone: +49 211 97020-195
Fax: +49 211 97020-949
Mobile: +49 173 5146567 (private)
E-Mail: mailto:[email protected]
Internet: http://www.net-m.de
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 48022
Vorstand: Theodor Niehues (Vorsitzender), Frank Hartmann,
Kai Markus Kulas, Dieter Plassmann
Vorsitzender des
Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Michael Briem
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
