Just to clarify question changed the subject:
addIndexesNoOptimize on shards --> is docid deterministic and calculable?
(IF docids of shards seperately are known)
Britske wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> say I have:
> - Indexreader[] readers = {reader1, reader2, reader3} //containing all
> different docs
> - I know the internal docids of documents in reader1, reader2, reader3
> seperately
>
> Does doing IndexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize(Indexreader[] readers) on
> these readers give me a determinstic and calculable set of docids on the
> documents in the resulting documentWriter?
>
> i.e: from http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_1/fileformats.html:
> "The numbers stored in each segment are unique only within the segment,
> and must be converted before they can be used in a larger context. The
> standard technique is to allocate each segment a range of values, based on
> the range of numbers used in that segment. To convert a document number
> from a segment to an external value, the segment's base document number is
> added."
>
> Does assinging docids in addIndexesNoOptimize work like this?
> in other words:
> - docids of docs in reader1 stay the same in indexwriter
> - docids of docs in reader2 are incremented by reader1.docs.size();
> - docids of docs in reader3 are incremented by reader1.docs.size() +
> reader2.docs.size()
>
> Thanks,
> Geert-Jan
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/addIndexesNoOptimize-on-shards---%3E-is-docid-deterministic-and-calculable--tp26197146p26197347.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
