1. Payload per document which could be updated without a need to update the entire document. Usecase: The state of our indexed content will change based on the User action (Created/ Viewed/Deleted etc) and we are using Lucene as our database and we cannot use relational database only for this feature.
2. Offload fieldcache to disk As every one knows sorting consumes huge memory, there is a need to offload it to disk using external caching mechanism. There is lot of discussion on sorting memory consumption in the group and this would be in everone's wishlist. 3. Custom fieldcache Currently fieldcache is created with number of documents available in the index. In our case we are using single index having multiple tables, and it is differentiated by the "Type" field. Only one type is required to sort and others is just stored data and not participating in the sort. This will certanily reduce the memory consumption. We cannot create one index for each table, which will be difficult to maintain. Regards Ganesh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:12 PM Subject: If you could have one feature in Lucene... > What would it be? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
