On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:54 AM, Andrew Bruno wrote:

> Since the disk IO on the server is high, our datacenter engineers suggested
> we look at NAS or SAN, for performance gain, and for future growth.

Alternatively, get a stack of RamSan and call it a day:

http://www.ramsan.com/products/products.htm

If you cannot afford these, something like Sun's storage server is a pretty 
cost effective solution:

http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/x64/031210.htm

Personally, I would stay away from a SAN based solution and favor local 
storage. As always, YMMV.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to