Couldn't one write a custom filter that modified the inbound term
semantics before doing the search? Then, wildcard behavior can be added to
terms without doing query string splicing.

> You might take a look at Ngrams. These can be used to find partial
> matches without resorting to wildcards, although they may add to
> your index size...
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Dirk Reske <d...@studiorga.de> wrote:
>
>> No, we don't want to user to write the * itself.
>> And seperate fields for the first and the last name are also not
>> acceptable.
>>
>> Image all the social networks, where you type a part of a name into the
>> textbox, and get all people whose names (first or last) contains one of
>> your searched words. The user should not be thinking about...just doing
>> it.
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:00:08 +0530, findbestopensource
>> <findbestopensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yes. Correct. It would be good, If User inputs the search string with
>> *.
>> >
>> > My Idea is to index two fields separately first name and last name.
>> Provide
>> > two text boxes with first name and last name. Leave the rest to the
>> User.
>> >
>> > Regrads
>> > Aditya
>> > www.findbestopensource.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Dirk Reske <d...@studiorga.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> we are quite new to lucene.
>> >> At first we want to create a simple user search for our web
>> application.
>> >> My first thought was to map die 'display name' (= firstname +
>> lastname)
>> to
>> >> a single field (analysed but not stored)
>> >> and to put the database id of the user to a stored, not analysed
>> field
>> (but
>> >> indexed).
>> >>
>> >> Then the user should have a simple text box, where he should be able
>> to
>> >> write the whole name, parts of the name etc...
>> >> So a search for "jo do" should also return the user "John Doe". How
>> to
>> >> create the query?
>> >>
>> >> My first solution was to tokenize the string using whitespaces an add
>> an
>> *
>> >> to each word and then concatenate all the words and use the query
>> parser,
>> >> so that the search string would be "jo* do*"...but then I've read,
>> that
>> I
>> >> should not programmaticly construct a string and use the queryparser.
>> >>
>> >> So what is the right way?
>> >>
>> >> Greets
>> >> Dirk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> Dirk Reske
>> Vogelsangstr. 24
>> 18437 Stralsund
>>
>> mail: d...@studiorga.de
>> mobile: +(49) 1522 2104741
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to