Looks basically OK to me. I wonder if you need the isCurrent() check
as well as if (newReader != reader) but shouldn't do any harm.
Likewise there doesn't seem much point in reassigning reader and
creating a new searcher if newReader is the same as reader. But I
don't think that either of those would cause new entries not to be
picked up.
I'd ask for some evidence and/or check that the new entries really
have been added.
--
Ian.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Lee Goddard <lee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Does this look correct? I am told it is not functioning, in that new
> entries to the index are not being picked-up?
>
> Thanks
> Lee
>
>
> try {
> if (! reader.isCurrent()){
> IndexReader newReader = reader.reopen();
> if (newReader != reader) {
> // reader was reopened
> searcher.close();
> reader.close();
> }
> reader = newReader;
> searcher = new IndexSearcher(reader);
> if (searcher == null) throw new ServletException( "searcher
> is null (init a)" );
> }
> } catch (CorruptIndexException e){
> throw new ServletException( "Could not refresh reader?
> "+e.getMessage() );
> } catch (IOException e){
> throw new ServletException( "Could not refresh reader?
> "+e.getMessage() );
> } catch (Exception e){
> throw new ServletException( "Could not re-open reader?
> "+e.getMessage() );
> }
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
