Hello Ranjit,

Can you use the latest luke tool ? It has analyzer section which helps in deciding which analyzer to use based on the input.

Hope this helps
-vinaya

On Monday 14 March 2011 07:18 PM, Ranjit Kumar wrote:

Hi,

I am creating index using Lucene 3.0.3 *StandardAnalyzer*.

when searching is made on index using query like *C*, *C#* or *C++* it gives same result for all these three term. As, I know while creating index analyzer ignore special character and do not create index for same. I have tried *KeywordAnalyzer *but it do not fulfill my requirement.

*Need to be able to differentiate between "C", "C#" and "C++"*

I have to create my own analyzer?

Or I have to modify the JFlex grammar? http://osdir.com/ml/java-dev/2009-06/msg00208.html

please suggest me that, Is any existing analyzer will resolve this issue?

Any suggestion will be appreciated!!!

Thanks & Regards,

*Ranjit Kumar ***

Associate Software Engineer

cid:image002.jpg@01CB7089.C0069B40

*US:*      +1 408.540.0001

*UK:*      +44 208.099.1660

*India:*  +91 124.474.8100 | +91 124.410.1350

*FAX:*    +1 408.516.9050

http://www.otssolutions.com

=================================================================================================== Private, Confidential and Privileged. This e-mail and any files and attachments transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. The content of this e-mail and any file or attachment transmitted with it may have been changed or altered without the consent of the author. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any review, dissemination, disclosure, alteration, printing, circulation or Transmission of this e-mail and/or any file or attachment transmitted with it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail or any file or attachment transmitted with it in error please notify OTS Solutions at i...@otssolutions.com ===================================================================================================

Reply via email to