While we are in constant sync due to the merge, lucene would still be updated multiple times before a solr 4 release, and it would be subject to happen at any time - so its really not any different.
On Wednesday, December 7, 2011, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, biggest issue for us is we're using the SolrCloud features. > While I see some good things related to the Lucene and Solr code bases > being merged, this is certainly a frustrating aspect of it as I don't > require some of the changes that are in Lucene 4.0 (withstanding > anything that SolrCloud requires that is). > > I think the best solution (assuming it works) is to try to lock a > version of Lucene 4.0 while upgrading Solr. I'll have to test to see > if this works or not, but at least it's something. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mike Sokolov <soko...@ifactory.com> wrote: >> My personal view, as a bystander with no more information than you, is that >> one has to assume there will be further index format changes before a 4.0 >> release. This is based on the number of changes in the last 9 months, and >> the amount of activity on the dev list. >> >> For us the implication is we need to stick w/3.x for now. You might be in a >> different situation if you really need the 4.0 changes. Maybe you can just >> stick w/the current trunk and take responsibility for patching critical >> bugfixes, hoping you won't have to recreate your index too many times... >> >> -Mike >> >> >> On 12/06/2011 09:48 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: >>> >>> I suppose that's fair enough. Some quick googling seems that this has >>> been asked many times with pretty much the same response. Sorry to >>> add to the noise. >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Darren Govoni<dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I asked here[1] and it said "Ask again later." >>>> >>>> [1] http://8ball.tridelphia.net/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/06/2011 08:46 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Robert. Is there a timetable for that? I'm trying to gauge >>>>> whether it is appropriate to push for my organization to move to the >>>>> current lucene 4.0 implementation (we're using solr cloud which is >>>>> built against trunk) or if it's expected there will be changes to what >>>>> is currently on trunk. I'm not looking for anything hard, just trying >>>>> to plan as much as possible understanding that this is one of the >>>>> implications of using trunk. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Robert Muir<rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jamie Johnson<jej2...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a timetable for when it is expected to be finalized? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> it will be finalized when Lucene 4.0 is released. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> lucidimagination.com >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
