Hi Chris, Yeah! That's a possibility, thanks :-)!
Jochen 2012/7/3 Chris Lu <chris...@gmail.com> > Can you index the rule1 and rule2 fields into the documents, and when > searching with the keywords, also append rule1:foo and rule2:bar to the > query? > > Chris > ------------------------- > Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application > site: http://www.dbsight.net > demo: http://search.dbsight.com > Lucene Database Search in 3 minutes: http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.** > php?title=Create_Lucene_**Database_Search_in_3_minutes<http://wiki.dbsight.com/index.php?title=Create_Lucene_Database_Search_in_3_minutes> > DBSight customer, a shopping comparison site, (anonymous per request) got > 2.6 Million Euro funding! > > > On 7/3/12 12:56 AM, Jochen Hebbrecht wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have an application which holds a list of documents. These documents are >> indexed using Lucene. >> I can search on keywords of the documents. I loop the TopDocs and get the >> ID field (of each Lucene doc) which is related to the ID column in my >> relational database. From all these ID's, I create a list. >> After building the list of ID's, I make a database query which is >> executing >> the following SELECT statement (JPA): >> >> << >> SELECT d From Document WHERE id IN (##list of ID's retrieved from >> Lucene##) >> This list of document is sent to the view (GUI). >> >> >> But, some documents are private and should not be in the list. Therefore, >> we have some extra statements in the SELECT query to do some security >> checks: >> >> << >> SELECT d From Document WHERE id IN (##list of ID's retrieved from >> Lucene##) >> AND rule1 = foo >> AND rule2 = bar >> But now I'm wondering: I'm using the speed of Lucene to quickly search >> documents, but I still have to do the SELECT query. So I'm loosing >> performance on this one :-( ... >> Does Lucene have some component which does this mapping for you? Or are >> there any best practices on this issue? How do big projects map the Lucene >> results to the relation database? Because the view should be rendering the >> results? >> >> Many thanks! >> Jochen >> >> > >
