Just curious - why not take your search feature offline during the reindexing? That would seem sensible from an operational perspective, I think.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Raghavan Parthasarathy < raghavan8...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We are using Lucene-core and we reindex once a day and plan to do it more > often in a day sooner. > > During re loading of the lucene indexes, some of the slave servers don't > recover and we have to restart them to get them working again. > > Here is the stacktrace: > > Here is the Full stack trace of BLOCKED search class: > > "daemon prio=5 state=BLOCKED > at > > org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader$CoreReaders.getTermsReader(SegmentReader.java:169) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentTermDocs.seek(SegmentTermDocs.java:57) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.MultiTermQueryWrapperFilter.getDocIdSet(MultiTermQueryWrapperFilter.java:120) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:176) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:104) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:176) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:104) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.CachingWrapperFilter.getDocIdSet(CachingWrapperFilter.java:203) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:176) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.ChainedFilter.getDocIdSet(ChainedFilter.java:104) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.CachingWrapperFilter.getDocIdSet(CachingWrapperFilter.java:203) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchWithFilter(IndexSearcher.java:544) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:525) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:384) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:291) > at > com.atypon.publish.search.SearchWorker.search(SearchWorker.java:98) > at > com.atypon.publish.search.SearchWorker.search(SearchWorker.java:41) > ..... > .... > > > We are using lucene-core version 3.1. Please tell us what we need to do to > resolve this issue. > > Thanks, > Raghavan >
