100 terms in a boolean query is not so costly. You could wrap that query in a ConstantScoreQuery to avoid the score calculation.
Why do you have separate indexes? It would be better to build a single document and index+store it on a single index. Thanks Emmanuel 2013/3/1 Ramprakash Ramamoorthy <youngestachie...@gmail.com> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Never rely on lucene internal doc ids. Use your own. Lucene searches > > on unique ids are of course very fast. > > > > Point taken Ian. So in case I have 100 matching doc Ids and so the next > step is either collate the 100 docIds into a query with OR, or do a > searcher.search() for 100 times. > > Fine, if it isn't very expensive. > > On a slightly related note, stumbled upon this thread > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/App-supplied-docID-in-lucene-possible-td4015797.htmlas > well. Some good discussion on this. > > > > > -- > > Ian. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy > > <youngestachie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello team, > > > > > > I have a query and I am explaining it as below. > > > > > > Objective : To split index and store, and combine it during query time > > > > > > Approach : Have two index writers, one will write a storedField and the > > > other will write an indexed Field(Index.TRUE). > > > > > > The Question : This happens sequentially(Store and index a single doc, > > then > > > move to the next one). Does this mean the docIds will be same in both > the > > > indexes stored and indexed (Assuming docIds are sequential)? Am > > interested > > > in this because, when I get the docIds from the indexed index during > the > > > query time, I can simply use reader.get(int docId) and retrieve the doc > > > from the stored index. Please to note, I don't perform any > update/delete > > on > > > the indexes. > > > > > > Other solution : Can have an app supplied UUID, which will additionally > > be > > > stored in the indexed index and also indexed in the stored index. But > the > > > problem is when I have fetched the UUIDs from the indexed index, I will > > > have to do a searcher.search(UUID1 .. UUIDn) on the stored field, > which I > > > feel is costly. > > > > > > Hope I am understandable and less ambiguous. Help appreciated. > > > > > > -- > > > With Thanks and Regards, > > > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, > > > India > > > +91 9626975420 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > With Thanks and Regards, > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, > India, > +91 9626975420 >
