In our old code, we create the filed like this.
Field metaField = new Field(name,strVal,fldDef.store,
Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS);
metaField.setOmitNorms(true);
*metaField.setIndexOptions(IndexOptions.DOCS_ONLY);*
luceneDoc.add(metaField);
The test case is quite simple, it only checks numhits.
public void testSpanTermQuery() throws Exception {
String req = "{\"query\":{\"span_term\":{\"color\":\"red\"}}}";
JSONObject res = search(new JSONObject(req));
assertEquals("numhits is wrong", 2160, res.getInt("numhits"));
}
The query is interpreted to "return new SpanTermQuery(new Term(field,
spanterm));"
In lucene 3.5 no exception is found and test is passed.
2013/8/13 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
> All span queries require positions to work; older Lucene released
> failed to catch you if you tried to use a span query on a field that
> did not index positions, but now Lucene 4.x does catch you (this is an
> improvement).
>
> You should double check your unit test: it really should not have been
> passing in Lucene 3.5 if it did not index positions ...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Yonghui Zhao <zhaoyong...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > One of my UT is passed In lucene 3.5, but it is failed in lucene4.3.
> > The exception is:
> >
> > IllegalStateException("field \"" + term.field() + "\" was indexed without
> > position data; cannot run SpanTermQuery (term=" + term.text() + ")");
> >
> >
> > After I change index option of the field from DOCS_ONLY to
> > DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS, the test is passed.
> >
> > I am wondering what's the reason of this limit in lucene 4.3.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
