Thanks for the advice! On 9/6/13 3:08 PM, "Oliver Xu (Aigine Co)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>You may want to try IKAnalyzer which what I have used for years. Never >see a >delay with this analyzer as you mentioned. > >Oliver > >-----邮件原件----- >发件人: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] 代表 >Erick Erickson >发送时间: 2013年9月6日 21:07 >收件人: java-user >主题: Re: Smart Chinese Analyzer Performance > >Well, various people have measured between a 50% and 70+% reduction in >memory used for identical data, so I'd say so. The CHANGES.txt is where >I'd >look to see if anything mentioned is worth your time. > >Not to mention SolrCloud... > >Erick > > >On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Darren Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am using the SmartChineseAnalyzer in v3.6 but accessing or >>instantiating >> it for the first time takes 10 to 15 seconds before it does anything. I >>do >> not see this huge delay with StandardAnalyzer. >> >> Is it loading a cache? Is there someway to speed it up? >> >> I am currently using Lucene 3.6 and am trying to upgrade to 4.4 but >> IntelliJ >> does not currently support SPI services. >> >> Does 4.4 offer substantial performance improvements that I should take >>the >> time to upgrade and work around the IntelliJ shortfall? >> >> Thanks, >> Darren >> >> >> > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
