No, not really. What would you do if you had a match contained entirely
within the overlapping region? You'd probably need a way to distinguish
that from a term that matched in two adjacent chunks, but *not* in the
overlap. Sounds very tricky to me.
-Mike
On 2/5/2014 2:21 AM, mrodent wrote:
Thanks, gives me food for thought. So no { N, N+1 } ideas specifically...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-about-using-lucene-on-large-documents-tp4115343p4115465.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
