FacetsConfig Object is same.
(indexConfig == searchConfig) returns true.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you can, while in debug mode try to note the instance ID of the
> FacetsConfig, and assert it is indeed the same (i.e. indexConfig ==
> searchConfig).
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> > Are you sure it's the same FacetsConfig at search time? Because the
> > exception implies your CITY field didn't have
> > config.setIndexFieldName("CITY", "city") called.
> >
> > Or, can you try commenting out 'config.setIndexFieldName("CITY",
> > "city")' at index time and see if the exception still happens?
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Jigar Shah <jigaronl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks for helping me.
> > >
> > > Yes, i did couple of things:
> > >
> > > Below is simple code for indexing which i use.
> > >
> > > TrackingIndexWriter nrtWriter
> > > DirectoryTaxonomyWriter taxoWriter = ...
> > > ....
> > > FacetsConfig config = new FacetConfig();
> > > config.setHierarchical("CITY", true)
> > > config.setMultiValued("CITY", true);
> > > config.setIndexFieldName("CITY","city") // I kept dimName different
> from
> > > indexFieldName
> > > ....
> > > Added indexing searchable fields...
> > > ....
> > >
> > > doc.add( new FacetField("CITY", "India", "Gujarat", "Vadodara" ))
> > > doc.add( new FacetField("CITY", "India", "Gujarat", "Ahmedabad" ))
> > >
> > > nrtWriter.addDocument(config.build(taxoWriter, doc));
> > >
> > > Below is code which i use for searching
> > >
> > > TaxonomyReader taxoReader = new DirectoryTaxonomyReader(taxoWriter);
> > >
> > > Query query = ...
> > > IndexSearcher searcher = ...
> > > DrillDownQuery ddq = new DrillDownQuery(config, query);
> > > DrillSideways ds = new DrillSideways(searcher, config, taxoReader); //
> > > Config object is same which i created before
> > > DrillSidewaysResult result = ds.search(query, null, null, start +
> limit,
> > > null, true, true)
> > > ...
> > > Facets f = result.facets
> > > FacetResult fr = f.getTopChildren(5, "CITY") [Exception is geneated]//
> > > Didn't perform any drill-down,really, its just original query for first
> > > time, but wrapped in DrillDownQuery.
> > >
> > > ... and below gives me empty collection.
> > >
> > > List<FacetResult> frs= f.getAllDims(5)
> > >
> > > I debug source code and found, it internally calls
> > >
> > > FastTaxonomyFacetCounts(indexFieldName, taxoReader, config) // Config
> > > object is same which i created before
> > >
> > > which then calls
> > >
> > > IntTaxonomyFacets(indexFieldName, taxoReader, config) // Config object
> is
> > > same which i created before
> > >
> > > And during this calls the value of indexFieldName is "$facets defined
> by
> > > constant 'public static final String DEFAULT_INDEX_FIELD_NAME =
> > "$facets";'
> > > in FacetsConfig.
> > >
> > > My question is if i am using same FacetsConfig while indexing and
> > > searching. why its not identifying correct name of field, and goes for
> > > "$facets"
> > >
> > > Please correct me if i understood wrong. or correct way to solve above
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > Many Thanks.
> > > Jigar Shah.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>
